I'm quoting it. But an attorney would be citing it in court.
No. It's not "too bad." It's legally and constitutionally actionable.But the firing was a violation of the Bill of Rights?Sorry, that's too bad.
MOST Civil Rights cases are taken by attorneys on contingency. Happens ALL the time. You don't need a million dollars. You don't even need one dollar. You just need a good clear case.You better have at LEAST a million dollars and several years to see your case through all of the lower courts up to the Supremes.And you still might not get your job back...
Yes... I am also talking about liability insurance. There is NOTHING about firearms being allowed on property. There is no such stipulation in those liability policies. NONE. Promise. It's a bullshit argument based on the fact that most people know nothing about it and won't do any investigation to vet that claim themselves. They'll just accept it, because it sounds "rational."
Liability insurance premiums vary quite a bit depending on the type of business and the related risks assessed by actuarial data. It's not that it's guns vs no guns. It's a SPECTRUM of risks associated with a SPECTRUM of business types. Similarly, a jewelry store will likely pay higher premiums than a toy store. A racing school or skydiving school will pay higher premiums than an art school.
Last edited:
