Back when SNL was funny.Yeah... My wife.... Moooooooorgan Fairchild. Yeah, that's her. She bought me a Cybertruck. That's the ticket.
Back when SNL was funny.Yeah... My wife.... Moooooooorgan Fairchild. Yeah, that's her. She bought me a Cybertruck. That's the ticket.
Classic cars, hot rods, muscle cars…. in 20 years you wont be able to give them away. Because the old guys who adore them and have the money to buy the cars they lusted after when they were young and in many cases could not afford will all be dead.
Depends on how agile they are. I’d like to believe they are smart people and see the writing on the wall.So you think Mecum and Barrett Jackson will be out of business? Ha... I don't think so.
Depends on how agile they are. I’d like to believe they are smart people and see the writing on the wall.
There will always be trade in collectibles. My prediction is that the number of collectors of today’s classic cars will substantially decrease. Nobody will be driving them. They become - actually already are - museum pieces. Some of the less refined or amateur rebuilds or restorations are already Sunday drivers. For old guys. Who as I said will be dead soon. I painfully admit that I am in that demographic. As are many of us here. If I have a pulse for another 25-30 years, I’ll be shocked and delighted at the same time.
I get that it’s sad that a couple decades from now nobody will give a shit about Ford Mustangs, Corvette’s, the Rolling Stones, or how hot Bo Derek or Michelle Pfeiffer was. But that’s reality. I’ll take a further leap and suggest that gunpowder-based ammo and firearms will seem like muskets to the rifles and handguns of 20-plus years from now. Relegated to antique gun collectors. Like exhaust fumes, the memory of the pungent small of gunpowder burning also dies with us. Moore's law also applies to weapons.
And the world will keep on turning.
I have read a few of those myself.A week or two ago, I read a review of that truck... it was NOT good. The reviewer was not impressed with the interior build quality, as I recall. A lot of other criticisms, too.
I have read a few of those myself.
Remember that these reviewers are looking at prototype trucks not the final product.
I will withhold judgement until the production line trucks are in the wild and reviewed by owners and industry peeps.
Slate has gone the extra mile to bring this truck in at the price point promised upon introduction. Minus the Federal $7500 incentive.
They have also listened to feedback from customers on the battery pack and changed the chemistry to increase range and still maintain the price point.
As with all new vehicle introductions, there will be teething pains. I worked for a car dealership and noticed that when a new car was introduced, the first production year had the most issues, the second year, much less, and by the third year the quality stabilized. And this was from both Ford and GM. You can't expect a startup to not have at least some of the same issues.
If Slate even comes close to surviving, their model will be copied. And improved upon. The Ford CEO admitted they don't have a clue how to build EVs. As in we have to start over. All the other major players are in that same boat. They can't compete once new players start springing up.I think Slate has a 50/50 chance at survival.
If they stay the course and focus on one goal, they might make it. Scratch the itch and fill the niche. Don't try and grow until the Slate truck has stable sales.
As previously observed, year 1 production is likely to have teething pains, as expected. If Slate aggressively addresses the issues, and year 2 has fewer issues, customer confidence will improve. By year 3 the issues should be resolved and sales should stabilize.
Plus, they have Bezos backing them. He will likely write at least one more big check to see if they sink or swim before pulling the plug. Say 5-7 years.
AND, it's FUGLY AFA week or two ago, I read a review of that truck... it was NOT good. The reviewer was not impressed with the interior build quality, as I recall. A lot of other criticisms, too.
It reminds me of a mid 80's Ford Ranger. Very squared off and not very imaginative styling wise. But the goal was not to build a fashion statement or go for styling points, the goal was to build a bare bones truck with a targeted price that almost anyone can afford. Styling took a back seat.AND, it's FUGLY AF
Any business that can't compete needs to go out of business. That's not Chinese. It's capitalism....after a Dumpocrap president removes the 100% tariff on Chinese automobiles...
Chinese MG, anyone?
View attachment 40541
View attachment 40542
In case you were wondering... That would be the first digit in your VIN.
View attachment 40543